For many membership organisations, there are very good reasons for wanting forums on their own websites rather than using LinkedIn.
Some membership organisations have very successful vibrant online forums. Some other organisations I come across have spent a significant amount of money without any meaningful take up.
For a professional membership organisation the potential advantages of "owning the forum" are significant:
A really good example of a successful vibrant forum is the Chartered Society for Physiotherapy. They have a significant proportion of their membership subscribing to a wide range of communities of interest across their clinical areas.
Another organisation I know of (but probably shouldn’t name) spent six months and a considerable amount of money on forum functionality on their website … which 18 months later is used for only one or two posts per month.
The key issue is that to get successful forums, you need to facilitate them and this probably means having a full time facilitator whose job it is to engage and connect community members by encouraging participation, facilitating and seeding discussions.
We held a seminar on online communities last autumn (the slides are available).
One of the speakers at our seminar and UK experts in this area is Steve Dale. Steve is the architect of the Local Government Communities of Practice initiative which has over 96,000 members across more than 1,500 communities. A recent blog post of Steve's discussed some of the issues around facilitation and success factors.
One of the key points Steve makes is that your own community is likely to be more trusted than an open community because the participants are all members (or potentially members and interested non-members who have registered with your website).
This blog post has been prompted by an interesting discussion on MemberWise ... actually on MemberWise's LinkedIn forum. This draws an interesting distinction - that LinkedIn works really well for MemberWise and is absolutely right for them. LinkedIn is a free resource and MemberWise has no budget for IT or for facilitation (other than the founder, Richard Gott's free time).
My conclusion is that onsite membership forums can be very successful and an important element in a membership association's business, but the investment has to be carefully targeted and managed - on facilitation as much as on IT.
I get asked the question ‘who is your favourite 19th century Prussian Field Marshal’ quite a lot, as I suspect you do as well. There are of course several great contenders for this title, but my vote has to go Helmuth Von Moltke the Elder. Why? Because of his contribution to the concept of dynamic planning! Trying to convince people that planning is a continuous and never ending process and not something that’s completed at the start of a project is a constant challenge for me and I will grab any support I can get.
Comments
Post new comment