The right governance processes are essential for business agility. Organisations wanting business agility without taking on board and implementing appropriate governance methods are likely to fail to achieve the benefits that business agility can bring.
In this post I'll conclude the mini-series on business agility by addressing the governance needs of business agility, both at the executive level and at the programme management office (PMO) level.
The senior management team / executives have to take ultimate ownership and responsibility for business agility because:
The team (or a sub-committee of) need to meet regularly to prioritise the set of change projects and change proposals that have been tabled for the next round of change. It is important that the frequency of the prioritisation meetings matches the speed of reaction needed to take advantage of opportunities that arise (or that there is a process for getting a rapid re-evaluation is an urgent opportunity arises).
Organisations using Agile (as recommended in the last post) often use these methods to prioritise the next sprints for major programmes.
The PMO's governance processes support the executive-level governance and manage the change projects:
These governance processes need to "fit" with the development processes being used. Where Agile methods are used, some have found this to be challenging, but there are approaches to providing suitable governance.
In addition to the above, the PMO needs to manage the skill set and capabilities for the current and probable future change projects, and more broadly for the needs of business agility. This is likely need to include customer insight, software competency and business analytics.
---
I hope you've found this blog post series useful. Any questions or comments?
I get asked the question ‘who is your favourite 19th century Prussian Field Marshal’ quite a lot, as I suspect you do as well. There are of course several great contenders for this title, but my vote has to go Helmuth Von Moltke the Elder. Why? Because of his contribution to the concept of dynamic planning! Trying to convince people that planning is a continuous and never ending process and not something that’s completed at the start of a project is a constant challenge for me and I will grab any support I can get.